<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phi, Lambda and (Slightly Embarassing) Temporality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/17/phi-lambda-and-slightly-embarassing-temporality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/17/phi-lambda-and-slightly-embarassing-temporality/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=phi-lambda-and-slightly-embarassing-temporality</link>
	<description>Geo-blogging, geo-talking and geo-tweeting, these are the occasional ramblings of a self professed &#34;geek with a life&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:44:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/17/phi-lambda-and-slightly-embarassing-temporality/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Holger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=740#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>The temporal equivalent for woeids are not time ranges but something more structured and less precise.  You&#039;d need permanent and unique ids for concepts like &quot;the middle ages&quot;, &quot;20th century&quot; &quot;the 1990&#039;s&quot; &quot;week 1 of 2010&quot;  etc. that can than be arranged in a similar structural hierarchy as woeids are hierarchically arranged.

Sadly, nobody has yet come up with these WITids (when-in-time ids).

But I agree that a WOEid/WITid pair would be a great way to represent things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The temporal equivalent for woeids are not time ranges but something more structured and less precise.  You&#8217;d need permanent and unique ids for concepts like &#8220;the middle ages&#8221;, &#8220;20th century&#8221; &#8220;the 1990&#8242;s&#8221; &#8220;week 1 of 2010&#8243;  etc. that can than be arranged in a similar structural hierarchy as woeids are hierarchically arranged.</p>
<p>Sadly, nobody has yet come up with these WITids (when-in-time ids).</p>
<p>But I agree that a WOEid/WITid pair would be a great way to represent things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

