<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latitude Inconsistitude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=latitude-inconsistitude</link>
	<description>Geo-blogging, geo-talking and geo-tweeting, these are the occasional ramblings of a self professed &#34;geek with a life&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:44:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1126#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>@Den: This sounds interesting; I&#039;ll take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Den: This sounds interesting; I&#8217;ll take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1126#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>@Arjun: I don&#039;t finish my role at Yahoo! until the 28th. of May. I&#039;ll probably be following this up with a &quot;The Yahoo! Years&quot; style blog post then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arjun: I don&#8217;t finish my role at Yahoo! until the 28th. of May. I&#8217;ll probably be following this up with a &#8220;The Yahoo! Years&#8221; style blog post then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wait till I come! &#187; TTMMHTM: Google delivers, Guardian delivers and some more developer goodies</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Wait till I come! &#187; TTMMHTM: Google delivers, Guardian delivers and some more developer goodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1126#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Latitude now has an API but it also shows some problems [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Latitude now has an API but it also shows some problems [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1126#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>and what do you think about Geo Messages approach: http://servletsuite.com/geomessage ?
Let you share location info peer to peer and does reveal identity (actually - even does not require ID&#039;s)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what do you think about Geo Messages approach: <a href="http://servletsuite.com/geomessage" rel="nofollow">http://servletsuite.com/geomessage</a> ?<br />
Let you share location info peer to peer and does reveal identity (actually &#8211; even does not require ID&#8217;s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Ram</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/20/latitude-inconsistitude/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1126#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>You guys were light years ahead with Fire Eagle. But as with other products the ball was dropped. Yahoo was/is good at connecting the dots early on but drops the ball. Why was this the case? Now that you are out of Yahoo would you care to pin point the problem.

Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys were light years ahead with Fire Eagle. But as with other products the ball was dropped. Yahoo was/is good at connecting the dots early on but drops the ball. Why was this the case? Now that you are out of Yahoo would you care to pin point the problem.</p>
<p>Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

