<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gary&#039;s Bloggage &#187; blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vicchi.org/tag/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vicchi.org</link>
	<description>Geo-blogging, geo-talking and geo-tweeting, these are the occasional ramblings of a self professed &#34;geek with a life&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Delicious Debacle And My Dependence On The Cloud</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/12/21/the-delicious-debacle-and-my-dependence-on-the-cloud/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-delicious-debacle-and-my-dependence-on-the-cloud</link>
		<comments>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/12/21/the-delicious-debacle-and-my-dependence-on-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 6 months ago, when I announced that after 4 years I was leaving Yahoo! to join Nokia I wrote &#8230; So whilst I’m going to Nokia, I’ll continue to use my core set of Yahoo! products, tools and APIs &#8230; <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/12/21/the-delicious-debacle-and-my-dependence-on-the-cloud/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 6 months ago, when I announced that after 4 years I was <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/05/31/locating-the-next-role-the-yahoo-years">leaving<br />
Yahoo! to join Nokia</a> I wrote &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
So whilst I’m going to Nokia, I’ll continue to use my core set of Yahoo! products, tools and APIs … YQL, Placemaker, GeoPlanet, WOEIDs, YUI, Flickr and Delicious. Not because I used to work for Yahoo! but because they’re superb products.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s still true but the recent news of the closure, or <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/yahoo-delicious-closure">shutting down</a>, or <a href="http://www.noodlepie.com/2010/12/not-so-delicious-anymore.html">selling off of Delicious</a> has been one of those significant events that makes you sit up and take notice. In this case, it&#8217;s made me take notice of just how much I rely on the vague and nebulous technology we call <em>the Cloud</em>.</p>
<p><a class="flickr-image aligncenter"  href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaneblog/4599383063/"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4049/4599383063_1229234b68_d.jpg" title="Delicious" alt="Delicious" /></a></p>
<p>So before going any further, it&#8217;s probably worth stating my own, totally subjective, view of what the Cloud is. It turns out that it&#8217;s actually a fairly simplistic definition. The Cloud is any form of remotely access storage where we put content, with the addition that there&#8217;s frequently a service and/or an API built on top of that storage. More importantly, it&#8217;s all of this content we produce and store in the Cloud that the fate of Delicious has shone a spotlight on. A quick, off the top of my head, list of Cloud based content looks something like this &#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Emails at vicchi.org, hosted on my ISPs IMAP server<em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Blog posts at <a href="http://www.vicchi.org">www.vicchi.org</a>, which hosts this post that you&#8217;re reading right now<em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Photos, hosted on <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vicchi">Flickr</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Shared files, hosted on <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/">Dropbox</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Tweets and status updates, hosted on <a href="http://twitter.com/vicchi">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/vicchi">Facebook</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Slide decks, hosted on <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/vicchi">Slideshare</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Professional profile, hosted on <a href="http://uk.linkedin.com/in/garygale">LinkedIn</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Short URLs, hosted on <a href="http://vtny.org/">vtny.org</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
<li>Bookmarks, hosted on <a href="http://www.delicious.com/vicchi">Delicious</a><em> &#8230; Cloud based</em></li>
</ul>
<p>The future of Delicious has made me think long and hard and ask three questions. How much of this content is easily exported or stored elsewhere? How irreplaceable is this content? How at risk is the service hosting the content?</p>
<ul>
<li><em>My email?</em> Not at high risk. I mirror all of my IMAP folders on my laptop which is regularly backed up.</li>
<li><em>My blog?</em> Not at high risk. I own the domain and I tend to maintain a mirror copy of my blog on my laptop and even if my ISP shuts down all my posts are easily exported and capable of being migrated elsewhere.</li>
<li><em>My photos?</em> Not at high risk, at least not yet. Although Flickr stores a lot of my photos, the master set is in iPhoto on a backed up removable drive.</li>
<li><em>My shared files?</em> Not at high risk. Dropbox automagically maintains a local mirror on each machine I use, which is backed up.</li>
<li><em>My tweets and status updates?</em> Medium risk here. Whilst there&#8217;s no sign of Twitter or Facebook shutting down, archiving and preserving my content here is challenging.</li>
<li><em>My slide decks?</em> Not at high risk. The master source of the decks is my laptop, which is regularly backed up.</li>
<li><em>My LinkedIn profile?</em> Medium risk. While LinkedIn allows me to export my contacts as far as I can tell there&#8217;s no way to export my profile and recommendations.</li>
<li><em>My short URLs?</em> Low risk. I own the vtny.org domain and the short URLs it generates are controlled entirely by me.</li>
<li><em>My bookmarks?</em> High risk. Even if Delicious is farmed out to another owner, <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/yahoo-delicious-closure">confidence in the service</a> has been severely dented but at least I can easily export all of my data.</li>
</ul>
<p>A quick look at the list above gives me ample cause for concern. There&#8217;s a lot of content I rely upon that is hosted on Cloud services over which I have little or no control and which often offer no means of exporting that data easily, if at all. But it gets worse &#8230;</p>
<p><a class="flickr-image aligncenter" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaneblog/4600023680/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1342/4600023680_1f50fb1593_d.jpg" alt="Flickr" title="Flickr" /></a> </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a massive amount of reliance and interdependence on each of these services. My blog relies on other Cloud services, for example almost every one of my blog posts is illustrated either with an embedded slide deck from Slideshare, with an embedded photo from Flickr or both. This post is a classic example of that. My other web site, at <a href="http://www.garygale.com/">www.garygale.com</a>, is dynamic and is almost entirely reliant on my Delicious bookmarks for providing links to my content hosted in other Cloud services.</p>
<p>The delicious irony here (pun fully intended) is that while the internet and the web are massively decentralised, they&#8217;ve been used to create a whole set of centralised and silo&#8217;d Cloud services, a large number of which my web presences rely upon. In the case of Delicious, I&#8217;ll stick with the service for now, until its future becomes less murky but as with my short URLs, hosting my own set of bookmarks will probably be on the agenda for early in 2011, along with the resulting disruption and work this will cause in integrating this new service into my web sites. But at least I&#8217;ll be owning and controlling my own Cloud services.</p>
<div class="credits">Photo Credits: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shaneblog/4600023680">Shaneblog</a> on Flickr.</div>
<div class="geo">Written and posted from home (51.427051, -0.333344)</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/12/21/the-delicious-debacle-and-my-dependence-on-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reclaim and Own Your Short URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls</link>
		<comments>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cli.gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tinyurl.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vtny.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yourls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many reasons to like the use of URL shorteners such as bit.ly and tinyurl.com. These free services take a long URL such as this post &#8211; http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls &#8211; and compresses them down to a much more manageable shorterned &#8230; <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many reasons to like the use of URL shorteners such as <a href="http://bit.ly">bit.ly</a> and <a href="http://tinyurl.com">tinyurl.com</a>. These free services take a long URL such as this post &#8211; <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls">http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls</a> &#8211; and compresses them down to a much more manageable shorterned version &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/aG1RBx">http://bit.ly/aG1RBx</a> or <a href="http://bit.ly/aG1RBx">http://tinyurl.com/ylaodny</a>.</p>
<p><em>They increase link sharing</em>; the vast majority of social networking sites use 140 characters as the maximum size for an update, using the full version of a URL you&#8217;re sharing reduces the amount of space for you to put your own thoughts into the update. Just compare the full URL <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls">http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls</a> at 65 characters against <a href="http://bit.ly/aG1RBx">http://bit.ly/aG1RBx</a> at 21 characters.</p>
<p><em>They can track and yield click and referrer information</em>; the information that bit.ly provides is so useful, showing live clicks, geographic and referrer information amongst others.</p>
<p><a class="flickr-image aligncenter" title="another" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/revrev/3275068102/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3414/3275068102_f753109c3e_d.jpg" alt="another awesome bit.ly site down graphic" /></a></p>
<p>But almost a year ago, Delicious founder and ex-Yahoo! Joshua Schachter made some pretty compelling arguments <a href="http://joshua.schachter.org/2009/04/on-url-shorteners.html">against short URLs</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The worst problem is that shortening services add another layer of indirection to an already creaky system. A regular hyperlink implicates a browser, its DNS resolver, the publisher&#8217;s DNS server, and the publisher&#8217;s website. With a shortening service, you&#8217;re adding something that acts like a third DNS resolver.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>But the biggest burden falls on the clicker, the person who follows the links. The extra layer of indirection slows down browsing with additional DNS lookups and server hits. A new and potentially unreliable middleman now sits between the link and its destination. And the long-term archivability of the hyperlink now depends on the health of a third party.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or to put it another way, you no longer own your links or the data clicks that those links yield. If the service dies, your links break, pure and simple, and that does happen, as the demise of the original <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/aug/10/url-shortening-shutdown-trim-bitly">tr.im</a> and <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/10/05/cli-gs-url-shortener-closes-up-shop/">cli.gs</a> services show.</p>
<p><a class="flickr-image aligncenter" title="Get used to it... tr.im is currently unavailable" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/playerx/3812229111/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3502/3812229111_b782326e13_d.jpg" alt="Get used to it... tr.im is currently unavailable" /></a></p>
<p>But there is a way to take all the benefit that short URLs offer and keep ownership of your links and all the data that clicks on those links will give you and that&#8217;s to run your own URL shortening service, which is precisely what I&#8217;ve done with <a href="http://vtny.org/">vtny.org</a> which is running the <a href="http://yourls.org/">YOURLS</a> code behind the scenes. This gives me all the benefits and metrics that other URL shorteners provide but with the added and crucial benefit that I now own the links and the data they generate, in this case via the <a href="http://vtny.org/4">vtny.org/4</a> short URL.</p>
<p><a class="flickr-image aligncenter" title="The URL shortener at vtny.org goes live" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vicchi/4403812096/"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4023/4403812096_e8bce41c98.jpg" alt="The URL shortener at vtny.org goes live" /></a></p>
<div class="credits">Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/playerx/3812229111/">playerx</a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/revrev/3275068102/">revrev</a> on Flickr</div>
<div class="geo">Written and posted from home (51.427051, -0.333344)</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/03/03/reclaim-and-own-your-short-urls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On The Matter of Blog Comments</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/02/02/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-the-matter-of-blog-comments</link>
		<comments>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/02/02/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowchart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whatever]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/2010/02/02/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After last week&#8217;s comments troll spat I decided to i) lighten up and ii) take a leaf out of the book of an author and blogger I deeply respect. So, inspired by a post on John Scalzi&#8217;s Whatever, I offer up a &#8230; <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/02/02/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="posterous_autopost">After last week&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/">comments troll spat</a> I decided to i) lighten up and ii) take a leaf out of the book of an author and blogger I deeply respect. So, inspired by a post on <a href="http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009/05/17/because-flowcharts-make-everything-clearer/">John Scalzi&#8217;s Whatever</a>, I offer up a brief decision making flowchart to aid me, in future, in deciding who <em>does</em> and who <em>does not</em> get to act stroppy over comments on this blog.</p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/vicchi/Lmh21CSU7BQ4Vvho12PIzA1jCXPIt4TzW9AGxk3Fwm84xY4zXHGklHsDhyPC/Comments.png"><img src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/vicchi/LppC0wJKujbjDV5Vfe6BmzT9tEfk92s5yxlA5VZS9uLqC5GvEVBVRPwgknXv/Comments.png.scaled.500.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="394" /></a></div>
<div>Thank you; normal service will be resumed in the next blog post.</div>
</div>
<p>
<div style="font-size: 12px;">Written and posted from home (51.427051, -0.333344)</div>
</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a> from <a href="http://vicchi.posterous.com/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments">Gary&#8217;s Posterous</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/02/02/on-the-matter-of-blog-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Comment?</title>
		<link>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=no-comment</link>
		<comments>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagged]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do we blog? It&#8217;s a gross simplification but I think the reasons are three-fold. Firstly when you write a blog post you have something to say, you need to find the right words and write them down, albeit virtually. &#8230; <a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="posterous_autopost">Why do we blog? It&#8217;s a gross simplification but I think the reasons are three-fold. Firstly when you write a blog post you have something to say, you need to find the right words and write them down, albeit virtually. Secondly, you want someone to read what you&#8217;ve written. Thirdly, sometimes you want to stimulate or generate a debate on a topic, to provoke discussion and to participate in a dialogue with the people who&#8217;ve read your words. The last of these reasons is why comments are open on my blog by default and why it&#8217;s not necessary to register on my blog, just to provide a name and an email address.</p>
<div>So why then, after writing all of the above, have I closed comments on<a href="http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/28/what-happens-when-geography-and-innovation-collide/"> my recent post on the Ordnance Survey supported GeoVation awards</a>?</div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/posselt/2572561965/"><img class="posterous_download_image" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2572561965_f177e68ffe.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></div>
<div>I woke up this morning to discover that the post had attracted a reasonable amount of traffic; I saw this from the stats on the <a href="http://bit.ly/db28kI">bit.ly</a> link to the post that was publicised on <a href="http://twitter.com/vicchi/status/8341077577">Twitter</a> and on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/vicchi?v=feed&amp;story_fbid=295744872989&amp;ref=mf">Facebook</a>, I saw this from a quick peek at my analytics logs and I saw this from the number of comments waiting for approval.</div>
<div>I firmly believe that everyone has the right to an opinion and a view on a topic and that they also have the right to air those views and opinions. But I also firmly believe that I have a right not to display abusive, offensive and derogatory comments on my personal blog and so I&#8217;ve removed those comments and closed the post for further comments. I&#8217;ve never had to do this before and I sincerely hope that I don&#8217;t have to do this again.</div>
<div>I made an informed decision as to whether to support the GeoVation scheme; you may not agree with that. You may feel the having the Ordnance Survey support the scheme and provide the seed fund is not something you want to be associated with. That&#8217;s totally fine but does it give you the right to be abusive towards me and have me publish that abuse? I don&#8217;t think so.</div>
<div>I&#8217;m really happy that you had a similar awards program in your country and that you feel it was better, or superior or vastly different that the GeoVation awards were in the UK. I&#8217;m not really sure that &#8220;<em>my awards are better than your awards</em>&#8221; make for meaningful or informed discussion though.</div>
<div>I&#8217;m sure that you think you could have come up with better ideas, better venture submissions, better applications, better uses of geography. So why didn&#8217;t you? Why didn&#8217;t you participate in GeoVation if you&#8217;re UK based or in a similar scheme in your country?</div>
<div>Time to move on from this topic I think.</div>
<div style="font-size: 12px;">Written and posted from the Yahoo! London office (51.5141985, -0.1292006)</div>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a> from <a href="http://vicchi.posterous.com/no-comment-88">Gary&#8217;s Posterous</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vicchi.org/2010/01/29/no-comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

